Identity element

Identity element

← Previous revision Revision as of 01:23, 22 April 2026
Line 3: Line 3:


==Definitions==
==Definitions==
Let {{math|(''S'', ∗)}} be a set {{mvar|S}} equipped with a [[binary operation]] ∗. Then an element {{mvar|e}} of {{mvar|S}} is called a {{visible anchor|left identity element|text='''[[left and right (algebra)|left]] identity'''}} if {{math|1=''e'' ∗ ''s'' = ''s''}} for all {{mvar|s}} in {{mvar|S}}, and a {{visible anchor|right identity element|text='''[[left and right (algebra)|right]] identity'''}} if {{math|1=''s'' ∗ ''e'' = ''s''}} for all {{mvar|s}} in {{mvar|S}}.{{harvtxt|Fraleigh|1976|p=21}} If {{mvar|e}} is both a left identity and a right identity, then it is called a '''{{visible anchor|two-sided identity}}''', or simply an '''{{visible anchor|identity}}'''.{{harvtxt|Beauregard|Fraleigh|1973|p=96}}{{harvtxt|Fraleigh|1976|p=18}}{{harvtxt|Herstein|1964|p=26}}{{harvtxt|McCoy|1973|p=17}}{{Cite web|url=https://brilliant.org/wiki/identity-element/|title=Identity Element {{!}} Brilliant Math & Science Wiki|website=brilliant.org|language=en-us|access-date=2019-12-01}}
Let {{nul|(''S'', ∗)}} be a set {{mvar|S}} equipped with a [[binary operation]] ∗. Then an element {{mvar|e}} of {{mvar|S}} is called a {{visible anchor|left identity element|text='''[[left and right (algebra)|left]] identity'''}} if {{math|1=''e'' ∗ ''s'' = ''s''}} for all {{mvar|s}} in {{mvar|S}}, and a {{visible anchor|right identity element|text='''[[left and right (algebra)|right]] identity'''}} if {{math|1=''s'' ∗ ''e'' = ''s''}} for all {{mvar|s}} in {{mvar|S}}.{{harvtxt|Fraleigh|1976|p=21}} If {{mvar|e}} is both a left identity and a right identity, then it is called a '''{{visible anchor|two-sided identity}}''', or simply an '''{{visible anchor|identity}}'''.{{harvtxt|Beauregard|Fraleigh|1973|p=96}}{{harvtxt|Fraleigh|1976|p=18}}{{harvtxt|Herstein|1964|p=26}}{{harvtxt|McCoy|1973|p=17}}{{Cite web|url=https://brilliant.org/wiki/identity-element/|title=Identity Element {{!}} Brilliant Math & Science Wiki|website=brilliant.org|language=en-us|access-date=2019-12-01}}


An identity with respect to addition is called an [[Additive identity|{{visible anchor|additive identity}}]] (often denoted as 0) and an identity with respect to multiplication is called a '''{{visible anchor|multiplicative identity}}''' (often denoted as 1). These need not be ordinary addition and multiplication—as the underlying operation could be rather arbitrary. In the case of a [[Group (mathematics)|group]] for example, the identity element is sometimes simply denoted by the symbol e. The distinction between additive and multiplicative identity is used most often for sets that support both binary operations, such as [[ring (mathematics)|ring]]s, [[integral domain]]s, and [[field (mathematics)|field]]s. The multiplicative identity is often called '''{{visible anchor|unity}}''' in the latter context (a ring with unity).{{harvtxt|Beauregard|Fraleigh|1973|p=135}}{{harvtxt|Fraleigh|1976|p=198}}{{harvtxt|McCoy|1973|p=22}} This should not be confused with a [[unit (ring theory)|unit]] in ring theory, which is any element having a [[multiplicative inverse]]. By its own definition, unity itself is necessarily a unit.{{harvtxt|Fraleigh|1976|pp=198,266}}{{harvtxt|Herstein|1964|p=106}}
An identity with respect to addition is called an [[Additive identity|{{visible anchor|additive identity}}]] (often denoted as 0) and an identity with respect to multiplication is called a '''{{visible anchor|multiplicative identity}}''' (often denoted as 1). These need not be ordinary addition and multiplication—as the underlying operation could be rather arbitrary. In the case of a [[Group (mathematics)|group]] for example, the identity element is sometimes simply denoted by the symbol e. The distinction between additive and multiplicative identity is used most often for sets that support both binary operations, such as [[ring (mathematics)|ring]]s, [[integral domain]]s, and [[field (mathematics)|field]]s. The multiplicative identity is often called '''{{visible anchor|unity}}''' in the latter context (a ring with unity).{{harvtxt|Beauregard|Fraleigh|1973|p=135}}{{harvtxt|Fraleigh|1976|p=198}}{{harvtxt|McCoy|1973|p=22}} This should not be confused with a [[unit (ring theory)|unit]] in ring theory, which is any element having a [[multiplicative inverse]]. By its own definition, unity itself is necessarily a unit.{{harvtxt|Fraleigh|1976|pp=198,266}}{{harvtxt|Herstein|1964|p=106}}