|
The limb bones of ''Chasmaporthetes'' were long and slender like those of cheetahs. It likely inhabited open ground and was a daytime hunter. The European ''C. lunensis'' is regarded as an active group hunter of medium-sized ungulates.[{{Cite journal |last=Salesa |first=Manuel J. |date=2006-01-01 |title=A complete skull of Chasmaporthetes lunensis (Carnivora, Hyaenidae) from the Spanish Pliocene site of La Puebla de Valverde (Teruel) |url=https://www.academia.edu/2453027/A_complete_skull_of_Chasmaporthetes_lunensis_Carnivora_Hyaenidae_from_the_Spanish_Pliocene_site_of_La_Puebla_de_Valverde_Teruel_ |doi=10.3989/EGEOL.0662132|journal=Academia}}] It may have preyed on the small Bourbon gazelle (''[[Gazella borbonica]]'') and the chamois antelope (''[[Procamptoceras brivatense]]''), and competed with the giant cheetah (''[[Acinonyx pardinensis]]'').[Kurtén, Björn (1968) ''Pleistocene mammals of Europe'', p. 68-69, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1968] The North American ''C. ossifragus'' was similar in build to ''C. lunensis'', but had slightly more robust jaws and teeth. It may have preyed on the giant marmot ''[[Paenemarmota]]'', and competed with the far more numerous ''[[Borophagus diversidens]]''.[Wang, Xiaoming & Tedford, Richard H. (2008) ''Dogs: their fossil relatives and evolutionary history'' Columbia University Press, {{ISBN|0-231-13528-9}}] |
|
The limb bones of ''Chasmaporthetes'' were long and slender like those of cheetahs. It likely inhabited open ground and was a daytime hunter. The European ''C. lunensis'' is regarded as an active group hunter of medium-sized ungulates.[{{Cite journal |last=Salesa |first=Manuel J. |date=2006-01-01 |title=A complete skull of Chasmaporthetes lunensis (Carnivora, Hyaenidae) from the Spanish Pliocene site of La Puebla de Valverde (Teruel) |url=https://www.academia.edu/2453027/A_complete_skull_of_Chasmaporthetes_lunensis_Carnivora_Hyaenidae_from_the_Spanish_Pliocene_site_of_La_Puebla_de_Valverde_Teruel_ |doi=10.3989/EGEOL.0662132|journal=Academia}}] It may have preyed on the small Bourbon gazelle (''[[Gazella borbonica]]'') and the chamois antelope (''[[Procamptoceras brivatense]]''), and competed with the giant cheetah (''[[Acinonyx pardinensis]]'').[Kurtén, Björn (1968) ''Pleistocene mammals of Europe'', p. 68-69, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1968] The North American ''C. ossifragus'' was similar in build to ''C. lunensis'', but had slightly more robust jaws and teeth. It may have preyed on the giant marmot ''[[Paenemarmota]]'', and competed with the far more numerous ''[[Borophagus diversidens]]''.[Wang, Xiaoming & Tedford, Richard H. (2008) ''Dogs: their fossil relatives and evolutionary history'' Columbia University Press, {{ISBN|0-231-13528-9}}] |
|
Relative to the body size of the species, the skull of ''C. lunensis'' was superbly adapted for dissipating stresses generated by struggling prey as they would have been subdued.[{{Cite journal |last1=Tseng |first1=Zhijie Jack |last2=Antón |first2=Mauricio |last3=Salesa |first3=Manuel J. |date=Winter 2011 |title=The evolution of the bone-cracking model in carnivorans: cranial functional morphology of the Plio-Pleistocene cursorial hyaenid Chasmaporthetes lunensis (Mammalia: Carnivora) |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/abs/evolution-of-the-bonecracking-model-in-carnivorans-cranial-functional-morphology-of-the-pliopleistocene-cursorial-hyaenid-chasmaporthetes-lunensis-mammalia-carnivora/B631F9559D330E6E2FC6354E9FD008C9 |journal=[[Paleobiology (journal)|Paleobiology]] |language=en |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=140–156 |doi=10.1666/09045.1 |issn=0094-8373 |access-date=7 March 2026 |via=Cambridge Core|url-access=subscription }}]> The [[cheek teeth]] of ''Chasmaporthetes'' were slender and sharp-edged like those of [[Felidae|felids]].[> A study on the genus' [[premolar]] intercuspid notches indicated ''Chasmaporthetes'' was likely [[hypercarnivore|hypercarnivorous]] rather than [[durophagous]] as its modern cousins (excluding the [[aardwolf]]) are.][{{Cite journal |last1=Hartstone-Rose |first1=A. |date=25 May 2011 |title=Reconstructing the diets of extinct South African carnivorans from premolar 'intercuspid notch' morphology |url=https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00821.x |journal=[[Journal of Zoology]] |language=en |volume=285 |issue=2 |pages=119–127 |doi=10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00821.x |issn=1469-7998 |access-date=10 April 2025 |via=Zoological Society of London|url-access=subscription }}] The microstructure of the [[Enamel of teeth|enamel]] of ''C. lunensis lunensis'' consists of more gently folding enamel than that found in bone-crushing hyaenids, further supporting the notion that it was not a specialist [[Osteophagy|osteophage]].[{{Cite journal |last1=Ferretti |first1=Marco P. |date=13 December 1999 |title=Tooth enamel structure in the hyaenid Chasmaporthetes lunensis lunensis from the Late Pliocene of Italy, with implications for feeding behavior |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.1999.10011189?casa_token=EVeLgPOp3YwAAAAA:7Yy34fG41WXG2ecEvzd8rDNgrBIg7KvOpBtAu2ooqmlY99KnX9B_KxTsHAw6w9GDdsZ1ec6miQ |journal=[[Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology]] |language=en |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=767–770 |doi=10.1080/02724634.1999.10011189 |issn=0272-4634 |access-date=12 January 2026 |via=Taylor and Francis Online|url-access=subscription }}] [[Dental microwear]] of ''C. australis'' from Langebaanweg in [[South Africa]] shows that the species was hypercarnivorous and rarely engaged in durophagy; its dental microwear was similar to the modern [[lion]], which seldom consumes bone.[{{Cite journal |last1=Stynder |first1=Deano D. |last2=Ungar |first2=Peter Stuart |last3=Scott |first3=Jessica R. |last4=Schubert |first4=Blaine W. |date=1 September 2012 |title=A Dental Microwear Texture Analysis of the Mio-Pliocene Hyaenids from Langebaanweg, South Africa |url=https://bioone.org/journals/acta-palaeontologica-polonica/volume-57/issue-3/app.2011.0053/A-Dental-Microwear-Texture-Analysis-of-the-Mio-Pliocene-Hyaenids/10.4202/app.2011.0053.full |journal=[[Acta Palaeontologica Polonica]] |language=en |volume=57 |issue=3 |pages=485–496 |doi=10.4202/app.2011.0053 |issn=0567-7920 |access-date=10 April 2025 |via=BioOne Digital Library|doi-access=free }}] |
|
The [[cheek teeth]] of ''Chasmaporthetes'' were slender and sharp-edged like those of [[Felidae|felids]]. Relative to the body size of the species, the skull of ''C. lunensis'' was superbly adapted for dissipating stresses generated by struggling prey as they would have been subdued.[{{Cite journal |last1=Tseng |first1=Zhijie Jack |last2=Antón |first2=Mauricio |last3=Salesa |first3=Manuel J. |date=Winter 2011 |title=The evolution of the bone-cracking model in carnivorans: cranial functional morphology of the Plio-Pleistocene cursorial hyaenid Chasmaporthetes lunensis (Mammalia: Carnivora) |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/abs/evolution-of-the-bonecracking-model-in-carnivorans-cranial-functional-morphology-of-the-pliopleistocene-cursorial-hyaenid-chasmaporthetes-lunensis-mammalia-carnivora/B631F9559D330E6E2FC6354E9FD008C9 |journal=[[Paleobiology (journal)|Paleobiology]] |language=en |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=140–156 |doi=10.1666/09045.1 |issn=0094-8373 |access-date=7 March 2026 |via=Cambridge Core|url-access=subscription }}] A study on the genus' [[premolar]] intercuspid notches indicated ''Chasmaporthetes'' was likely [[hypercarnivore|hypercarnivorous]] rather than [[durophagous]] as its modern cousins (excluding the [[aardwolf]]) are.[{{Cite journal |last1=Hartstone-Rose |first1=A. |date=25 May 2011 |title=Reconstructing the diets of extinct South African carnivorans from premolar 'intercuspid notch' morphology |url=https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00821.x |journal=[[Journal of Zoology]] |language=en |volume=285 |issue=2 |pages=119–127 |doi=10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00821.x |issn=1469-7998 |access-date=10 April 2025 |via=Zoological Society of London|url-access=subscription }}] The microstructure of the [[Enamel of teeth|enamel]] of ''C. lunensis lunensis'' consists of more gently folding enamel than that found in bone-crushing hyaenids, further supporting the notion that it was not a specialist [[Osteophagy|osteophage]].[{{Cite journal |last1=Ferretti |first1=Marco P. |date=13 December 1999 |title=Tooth enamel structure in the hyaenid Chasmaporthetes lunensis lunensis from the Late Pliocene of Italy, with implications for feeding behavior |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.1999.10011189?casa_token=EVeLgPOp3YwAAAAA:7Yy34fG41WXG2ecEvzd8rDNgrBIg7KvOpBtAu2ooqmlY99KnX9B_KxTsHAw6w9GDdsZ1ec6miQ |journal=[[Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology]] |language=en |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=767–770 |doi=10.1080/02724634.1999.10011189 |issn=0272-4634 |access-date=12 January 2026 |via=Taylor and Francis Online|url-access=subscription }}] [[Dental microwear]] of ''C. australis'' from Langebaanweg in [[South Africa]] shows that the species was hypercarnivorous and rarely engaged in durophagy; its dental microwear was similar to the modern [[lion]], which seldom consumes bone.[{{Cite journal |last1=Stynder |first1=Deano D. |last2=Ungar |first2=Peter Stuart |last3=Scott |first3=Jessica R. |last4=Schubert |first4=Blaine W. |date=1 September 2012 |title=A Dental Microwear Texture Analysis of the Mio-Pliocene Hyaenids from Langebaanweg, South Africa |url=https://bioone.org/journals/acta-palaeontologica-polonica/volume-57/issue-3/app.2011.0053/A-Dental-Microwear-Texture-Analysis-of-the-Mio-Pliocene-Hyaenids/10.4202/app.2011.0053.full |journal=[[Acta Palaeontologica Polonica]] |language=en |volume=57 |issue=3 |pages=485–496 |doi=10.4202/app.2011.0053 |issn=0567-7920 |access-date=10 April 2025 |via=BioOne Digital Library|doi-access=free }}] |