Best New Poets
Critical response: Repair dead ref
| ← Previous revision | Revision as of 23:45, 27 April 2026 | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
It's a nervy thing for an anthology to label itself ''Best New Poets'', but...this collection lives up to its name. It's a rich and readable selection, reflecting no party-line aesthetic, and attesting to the formidable promise of the emerging generation."{{cite web |title=Best New Poets 2007 |url=https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/3816 |publisher=University of Virginia Press |access-date=October 16, 2022 |language=en}} |
It's a nervy thing for an anthology to label itself ''Best New Poets'', but...this collection lives up to its name. It's a rich and readable selection, reflecting no party-line aesthetic, and attesting to the formidable promise of the emerging generation."{{cite web |title=Best New Poets 2007 |url=https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/3816 |publisher=University of Virginia Press |access-date=October 16, 2022 |language=en}} |
||
Of the 2006 edition, [[ForeWord (magazine)|''ForeWord'' Magazine]] wrote, With an alert ear for new voices, this anthology offers a different kind of validation: that of being well-heard. The result is a vibrant smorgasbord..."{{ |
Of the 2006 edition, [[ForeWord (magazine)|''ForeWord'' Magazine]] wrote, With an alert ear for new voices, this anthology offers a different kind of validation: that of being well-heard. The result is a vibrant smorgasbord..."{{cite web |title=Article Archives {{!}} Foreword Reviews |url=https://www.forewordmagazine.com/articles/shw_article.aspx?articleid=212 |website=ForeWord Magazine |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070629005751/https://www.forewordmagazine.com/articles/shw_article.aspx?articleid=212 |archive-date=June 29, 2007}} |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
